Cit v hindustan bulk carriers
WebOct 8, 2002 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers: Court: SUPREME COURT: Relevant Act: Income-tax: Date of Order: 08/10/2002 : Judgment: View Judgment: Keyword Tags: settlement … WebDec 14, 2024 · In CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers, (2003) 3 SCC 57, p. 74 case, the Court held that the courts must avoid a ‘head of clash’ of contradictory provisions and they must construe the contradictory …
Cit v hindustan bulk carriers
Did you know?
WebThis rule evolved from the case Shankari Prasad v. Union of India3 where there was a conflict between part III and part IV of the constitution. The Supreme Court used the principle of ... CIT v. Hindustan bulk carriers4: The Supreme Court of India has given five principles of Harmonious Construction. 4 AIR (2003) SC 3942 . WebMar 11, 2024 · In case of CIT V Hindustan Bulk Carriers AIR 2002 SC 3941, Supreme Court laid down that: “the courts must avoid head on clash of seemingly contradicting provisions and they must construe the …
WebAug 30, 2024 · In the landmark case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers (2003) the supreme court laid down five principles of rule of harmonious construction: The courts … WebMay 8, 2024 · Principals of the Doctrine. In the case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carrier[i], the Supreme Court gave five principles for interpreting the statute which are following: 1. …
WebMay 22, 2024 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers, (2003) 3 SCC 57, p. 74.) The provision of one section cannot be used to defeat the provision contained in another unless the court, … WebThe Supreme Court in the CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers, 259 ITR 449 pointed out that there is no power to waive tax or interest as tax or interest has to be determined under the provisions of the Act. 4.
WebJun 25, 2024 · The Supreme Court laid down following rules of harmonious construction in the case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers[7]:- The courts must avoid a head on clash …
WebIt is the contention of learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue that the said order is illegal and erroneous, in view of the judgment rendered by this court in CIT v. Anjum M.H. Ghaswalaand also the decision rendered by this court in C. A. Nos. 7966-7967 of 1996 entitled CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carrierson December 17, 2002, [2003] 259 ITR 449. 6. new song of arijit singhWebDec 21, 2024 · The Doctrine of Harmonious Construction: The Parliament makes a separate set of statutes, rules, legislation, and constitutional provisions under their well-defined powers. While framing these provisions has to be done very carefully, conflict sometimes occurs due to overlapping in their enforcement. new song of eddy kenzoWebJan 24, 2024 · In Indian constitution, no absolute right is given to its citizens therefore Art 20 (1) subject to certain restrictions. Preventive Detention In order to maintain peace and to … new song of christopherWebSupreme Court of India Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Hindustan Bulk Carriers on 8 October, 2002 Equivalent citations: AIR 2002 SC 3491, (2002) 177 CTR SC 531, 2002 … middleborough ma police logWebDec 17, 2002 · Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers Supreme Court Of India Dec 17, 2002 Subsequent References CaseIQ TM (AI Recommendations) Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers Important Paras Please … middleborough ma little league teamWebSep 22, 2024 · The Court in the case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers laid down the five principles of harmonious construction- The courts must avoid a ‘head of clash’ of contradictory provisions and they must construe the contradictory provisions so as to harmonize them. middleborough lakeville commuter railWebHindustan Bulk Carriers. 3. Doctrine of Eclipse This doctrine is applicable to pre-existing laws under Article 13 (1). Article 13 provides that any law which made before the commencement of constitution must be consistent with the part III of the constitution. new song of chriss eazy